51黑料吃瓜在线观看,51黑料官网|51黑料捷克街头搭讪_51黑料入口最新视频

設為首頁 |  加入收藏
首頁首頁 期刊簡介 消息通知 編委會 電子期刊 投稿須知 廣告合作 聯(lián)系我們
骨科機器人輔助手術治療骨盆骨折的臨床應用研究

The clinical effects of robot-assisted orthopedic surgery on pelvic fracture patients

作者: 李燦輝吳征杰曾焰輝何影浩司徒曉鵬杜雪蓮洪石何家雄  
單位:佛山市中醫(yī)院骨科(廣東佛山 528000) <p>通信作者:吳征杰。E-mail:&nbsp;[email protected]</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>
關鍵詞: 骨盆骨折;骨科機器人;手術治療  
分類號:&nbsp;R318&nbsp;&nbsp; <p>&nbsp;</p>
出版年·卷·期(頁碼):2022·41·2(134-139)
摘要:

目的  探討骨科機器人輔助手術治療骨盆骨折的具體臨床應用效果。方法 回顧性收集2018年2月至2019年7月于佛山市中醫(yī)院行微創(chuàng)手術治療的Tile B、C型骨盆骨折患者112名。根據(jù)手術方式將患者分為骨科機器人輔助微創(chuàng)手術組和傳統(tǒng)透視輔助微創(chuàng)手術組。對比兩組患者的術中出血量、手術時間、置釘時間、螺釘非計劃置入比例、位置偏移率、骶髂螺釘置入誤差范圍以及螺釘位置偏移程度。術后比較兩組患者Matta評分比較兩組復位質量,末次Majeed評分比較兩組患者的功能以及并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生情況。結果 兩組患者基線資料顯示無明顯統(tǒng)計學差異(P>0.05)。骨科機器人輔助微創(chuàng)手術組術中出血量、手術時間、置釘時間、螺釘偏移位置以及骶髂螺釘置入誤差范圍都明顯少于傳統(tǒng)透視輔助微創(chuàng)手術組,差異性具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P<0.05)。術后結果對比分析顯示,骨科機器人輔助微創(chuàng)手術組術后滿意率、功能恢復情況都明顯優(yōu)于傳統(tǒng)透視輔助微創(chuàng)手術組(P<0.05)。同時,骨科機器人輔助微創(chuàng)手術組術后并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生率明顯低于傳統(tǒng)透視輔助微創(chuàng)手術組(P<0.05)。兩組患者術后螺釘位置偏移程度以及螺釘非計劃置入數(shù)無明顯統(tǒng)計學差異(P>0.05)。結論 骨科機器人輔助手術針對不穩(wěn)定型骨盆骨折患者具有良好的臨床應用效果。

 

Objective To determine the clinical effects of robot-assisted orthopedic surgery technique on pelvic fracture patients. Methods This is a retrospective study. From Feb. 2018 to July 2019, a total of 112 tile B and tile C type of orthopedic fracture patients in Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine underwent minimally invasive orthopedic surgery were included into this study. According to the surgery techniques, patients were divided to robot-assisted orthopedic surgery group and traditional orthopedic surgery group. Intraoperative indicators including intraoperative blood loss, operating time, nail placement time, the proportion of unplanned screw placement, the position deviation rate, the error range of sacroiliac screw placement and screw position deviation degree were recorded and compared between groups. Postoperatively, Matta score, Majeed score and complication happened were compared between groups. Results The baseline characteristics comparison showed no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative indicators showed that intraoperative blood loss, operating time, nail placement time, the proportion of unplanned screw placement, the position deviation rate and the error range of sacroiliac screw placement in robot-assisted orthopedic surgery group were all superior to the traditional orthopedic surgery group with significance (P<0.05). At postoperative comparisons, the Matta scores and Majeed scores at the robot-assisted orthopedic surgery group showed better results than traditional orthopedic surgery group with significance (P <0.05). The complication occurrence rate was significantly lower at robot- assisted orthopedic group when compared to traditional orthopedic group. (P<0.05). There showed no significant difference between groups in screw position deviation degree and unplanned screw placement (P>0.05). Conclusions Robot-assisted orthopedic surgery can be an effective way to treat unstable pelvic fracture with preferable clinical effects.

 

參考文獻:

[1] Chu CH, Tennakoon L, Maggio PM, et al.Trends in the management of pelvic fractures, 2008-2010[J].The Journal of?Surgical?Research,2016,202(2):?335-340.

[2] 許海峰,王東健,王謙,等.?不穩(wěn)定骨盆后環(huán)骨折內(nèi)固定治療現(xiàn)狀[J].國際骨科學雜志,2015,?36(4):281-284.

[3] Sharpe JP, Magnotti LJ, Gobbell WC, et al. Impact of early operative pelvic fixation on long- term self-reported outcome following severe pelvic fracture[J]. The Journal of?Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2017, 82(3): 444- 450.

[4] Avilucea FR, Sathiyakumar V, Greenberg SE, et al. Open distal tibial shaft fractures: a retrospective comparison of medial plate versus nail fixation[J]. European?Journal of?Trauma and Emergency?Surgery, 2016, 42(1): 101- 106.

[5] Hermann EJ, Petrakakis I, G?tz F, et al. Surgical treatment of distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms aided by electromagnetic navigation CT angiography[J]. Neurosurgical?Review, 2015, 38(3): 523-530.

[6] 徐啟飛,?林巋然,?趙代杰,?等. 骶髂關節(jié)螺釘聯(lián)合前環(huán)恥骨支螺釘在Tile B型骨盆骨折中的應用 [J]. 中國骨傷,2017,30(3): 202-207.

Xu?QF,?Lin?KR,?Zhao?DJ, et al.?Clinical application of percutaneous iliosacral screws combined with pubic ramus screws in Tile B pelvic fracture[J].??China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology,2017,30(3): 202-207.

[7] Schlitzkus LL, Van Vliet M, Frankel HL. Damage control: from principles to practice[M]//?Trauma Team Dynamics.?Berlin: Springer Nature Switzerland AG,?2016: 99-108.

[8] Acheampong EA. Assessing the impact of an operating tailings storage facility on catchment surface and groundwater quality: a case study of adamus resources limited (Nzema gold mine) in the Ellembele district of the western region of Ghana[D]. Accra: University of Ghana, 2016.

[9] Schleer?P, Drobinsky?S,?de la?Fuente?M,?et al.?Toward versatile cooperative surgical robotics: a review and future challenges[J].?International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery,?2019,14(10):1673-1686.

[10] Matta J M, Tornetta P. Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries[J]. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,?1996(329):129-140.

[11]?Majeed SA.Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures [J].The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume,1989,71(2):304-306.

[12] Chhabra S, Chhabra N, Kaur A, et al. Wound healing concepts in clinical. practice of OMFS[J]. Journal of?Maxillofacial and?Oral Surgery, 2017, 16(4): 403-423.

[13] Wei X, Li F, Zhao G, et al. Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies of HPMA copolymer conjugates in an aseptic implant loosening mouse model[J]. Molecular?Pharmaceutics, 2017, 14(5): 1418-1428.

[14] 馮小仍,陳濱,余斌.?骨盆后環(huán)骨折內(nèi)固定方式的穩(wěn)定性探究[J]. 臨床外科雜志, 2016, 24(5): 332-335.

[15] Li CL. Clinical comparative analysis on unstable pelvic fractures in the treatment with. percutaneous sacroiliac screws and sacroiliac joint anterior plate fixation [J]. European?Review?for Medical?Pharmacological?Sciences,?2014,?18(18):?2704-2708.

[16] Schweitzer D, Zylberberg A, Córdova M, et al. Closed reduction and iliosacral percutaneous fixation of unstable pelvic ring fractures[J]. Injury, 2008,39(8): 869-874.

[17] 應凱,遲曉飛,王文輝.骨盆前外固定術在不穩(wěn)定性骨盆骨折治療中的應用效果觀察[J].山東醫(yī)藥,2015,55(6):89-90.

[18] Scheyerer MJ, Zimmermann SM, Osterhoff?G, et al. Anterior subcutaneous internal fixation for treatment of unstable pelvic fractures[J].?BMC Research?Notes, 2014, 7:?133.

[19] Vaidya R, Martin AJ, Roth M, et al.?Midterm radiographic and functional outcomes of the anterior subcutaneous internal pelvic fixator?(INFIX)?for pelvic ring injuries[J].?Journal of?Orthopaedic?Trauma, 2017, 31(5):?252-259.

[20] Dahil M, Mcarthur J, Roberts GL, et al.?The use of an anterior pelvic internal fixator to treat disruptions of the anterior pelvic ring?a report of technique, indications and complications[J].The Bone & Joint Journal, 2017, 99/B(9):1232-1236.

[21] Krappinger D, Kaser V, Kammerlander C, et al.?Inter-and intraobserver reliability and critical analysis of the FFP classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries[J].?Injury, 2019, 50(2):?337-343.

[22]龐園, 陳慧,莊君龍. Robocare全程干預模式應用于機器人輔助下前列腺癌根治術中的效果[J].中國醫(yī)藥導報,2020,17(22):156-159.

Pang Y, Chen H, Zhuang JL. Effect of Robocare′s full intervention mode in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. China Medical Herald, 2020,17(22):156-159.

[23] Liu Z, Wang K, Zhang K, et al.?Minimaly invasive surgery?(MIS) of anterior ring. fracture combined with pubic symphysis separation[J].?Medical?Science?Monitor, 2014, 20:?1913- 1917.

?

服務與反饋:
文章下載】【加入收藏
提示:您還未登錄,請登錄!點此登錄
 
友情鏈接  
地址:北京安定門外安貞醫(yī)院內(nèi)北京生物醫(yī)學工程編輯部
電話:010-64456508  傳真:010-64456661
電子郵箱:[email protected]