51黑料吃瓜在线观看,51黑料官网|51黑料捷克街头搭讪_51黑料入口最新视频

設(shè)為首頁(yè) |  加入收藏
首頁(yè)首頁(yè) 期刊簡(jiǎn)介 消息通知 編委會(huì) 電子期刊 投稿須知 廣告合作 聯(lián)系我們
淺析醫(yī)院科研活動(dòng)中的誠(chéng)信風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因素與防控

Analyze the factors of untrustworthy behavior in scientific research and measures for hospital management

作者: 李曉璐  岳花蘭  李葳  吳廣輝  吳濤  于洋  張宏家 
單位:首都醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬北京安貞醫(yī)院(北京100029)<br />通信作者: 岳花蘭。E-mail:[email protected]
關(guān)鍵詞: 醫(yī)院管理;科研誠(chéng)信;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防控 
分類號(hào):R318&nbsp;
出版年·卷·期(頁(yè)碼):2022·41·5(538-541)
摘要:

科研誠(chéng)信是科技創(chuàng)新的基石,科技創(chuàng)新是推動(dòng)醫(yī)院高質(zhì)量發(fā)展的重要戰(zhàn)略,同時(shí)醫(yī)院也是科技創(chuàng)新思想的發(fā)源地,是科技創(chuàng)新人才培育基地。本文通過(guò)分析在醫(yī)院環(huán)境下常見(jiàn)的科研誠(chéng)信失信行為及其產(chǎn)生因素,依據(jù)以防范為主懲戒為輔的原則,從醫(yī)院管理制度和人才選評(píng)聘制度、科研活動(dòng)過(guò)程管理、醫(yī)院人文理念宣傳、懲戒制度等方面為切入點(diǎn),提出防控措施。將科研誠(chéng)信理念銘記于臨床醫(yī)生和科研人員的內(nèi)心,用科學(xué)家精神筑牢科研誠(chéng)信底線,尊重科研發(fā)展規(guī)律,規(guī)范科研行為,降低科研誠(chéng)信失范風(fēng)險(xiǎn),可有效防控科研失信行為的發(fā)生。

Scientific research integrity is the cornerstone of scientific and technological innovation, that promotes the high-quality development of hospitals. Accordingly the hospital is a birthplace for scientific and technological innovation ideas, the cultivation base of scientific and technological innovation talents. This paper analyzes the common scientific research integrity and dishonesty behavior and its causes in the hospital environment, and puts forward prevention and control measures from the hospital management system, talent selection and evaluation system, scientific research activity process management, hospital humanistic concept publicity, punishment system and other aspects based on the principle of giving priority to prevention and punishment. Keeping the concept of scientific research integrity in the hearts of clinicians and researchers, building the bottom line of scientific research integrity with the spirit of scientists, respecting the law of scientific research development, standardizing scientific research behavior, and reducing the risk of scientific research integrity anomie can effectively prevent and control the occurrence of scientific research dishonesty.

參考文獻(xiàn):

[1] 吳艷.科學(xué)技術(shù)活動(dòng)違規(guī)行為處理規(guī)則研究—兼評(píng)《科學(xué)技術(shù)活動(dòng)違規(guī)行為處理規(guī)定征求意見(jiàn)稿[J].科技創(chuàng)新發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究, 2020, 4(5):1-4.
Wu Y.Study on processing rules of irregularity in scientifi c and technological activities:comment on the processing regulation of irregularity in scientifi c and technological activities (exposure draft) [J]. Strategy for Innovation and Development of Science and Technology, 2020, 4(5):1-4.
[2] 俞盼盼.醫(yī)院科研活動(dòng)中的誠(chéng)信風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防控[J].商情, ?2019, 34(1):106.
[3] 鄧志歡.科研誠(chéng)信問(wèn)題成因分析及治理分析[J].科技資訊, 2020, 18(21):102-103,106.
Deng ZH.An analysis of the causes of the problem of scientific research integrity and its governance[J]. Science & Technology Information, 2020, 18(21):102-103,106.
[4] 賀德方, 陳傳夫, 曾建勛.科研活動(dòng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化研究初探[J].科學(xué)學(xué)研究, 2021, 39(6):989-997.
He DF,Chen CF,Zeng JX. Research on standardization of scientific research activities[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2021, 39(6):989-997.
[5] 余巖.對(duì)加強(qiáng)科研誠(chéng)信建設(shè)的思考[J].鐵道經(jīng)濟(jì)研究, 2021(3):36-39.
Yu Y. Reflection on strengthening the construction of scientific research integrity[J]. Railway Economics Research, 2021(3):36-39.
[6] 周湘林.體系與內(nèi)容:科研誠(chéng)信問(wèn)責(zé)制度分析[J].江蘇高教, 2020, 0(3):60-67.
Zhou XL. System and content:an analysis of research integrity accountability system[J]. Jiangsu higher education, 2020(3):60-67.
[7] 張永利, 薛彥華, 蘇國(guó)安.現(xiàn)狀·問(wèn)題·建議:我國(guó)高校科研誠(chéng)信法律規(guī)制研究[J]. 大學(xué):研究與管理, 2022 (4):184-188.

服務(wù)與反饋:
文章下載】【加入收藏
提示:您還未登錄,請(qǐng)登錄!點(diǎn)此登錄
 
友情鏈接  
地址:北京安定門外安貞醫(yī)院內(nèi)北京生物醫(yī)學(xué)工程編輯部
電話:010-64456508  傳真:010-64456661
電子郵箱:[email protected]